Thursday, July 12, 2012

Disposing of a Business - Allocating Sales Price

When the assets of a going concern are sold to a single buyer, the buyer and seller generally must allocate the purchase price among the tangible and intangible assets that are being sold. As the seller, you will want to allocate as much of the purchase price as possible to assets that yield capital gains, rather than ordinary income. The buyer's concern, on the other hand, will be to allocate as much of the purchase price as possible to assets that do not have to be fully capitalized and can be written off quickly.

These tensions are at play in all business asset sales, but they vary with changes in the parties' circumstances and in the tax laws. Since you plan to sell the assets of your business, we want to give you an overview of how the allocation process required by the Internal Revenue Code works.

The mandated method is called the "residual allocation method," which has a hierarchy of seven categories:

Class I assets: These are cash, and cash equivalents, such as demand bank accounts.

Class II assets: These are items such as certificates of deposit, government securities, and other readily marketable securities.

Class III assets: These are items such as accounts receivable, mortgages, and most debt instruments.

Class IV assets: Items such as stock in trade, inventory, and property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.

Class V: These consist of all assets other than Class I, II, III, IV, VI, and VII).

Class VI: All Code Sec. 197 intangibles except goodwill and going concern value.

Class VII: Goodwill and going concern value.

Allocations are made first to the top category of assets, then to the second, and third. Whatever is left unallocated automatically is allocated to intangible assets in the nature of goodwill and going concern value.

Buyers and sellers will try to the extent possible to make allocations that serve their own tax interests. While no asset can receive an allocation greater than its fair market value, that value cannot always be determined with mathematical precision, so there often is some room to maneuver. The buyer and seller, however, both must use whatever allocation they finally agree to.

Until a couple of years ago, sellers wanted to allocate as much as possible to goodwill and going concern value, because it gave them capital gain. Buyers hated allocations to these assets, because they couldn't be written off. Now, however, they can be written off over 15 years.

Many other purchased intangible assets, such as covenants not to compete, that buyers used to write off over their terms, now can't be written off over less than 15 years. So buyers may want to enter into consulting agreements to shift some allocation away from the covenant not to compete and to get more immediate tax benefit from their expenditures. Although covenants not to compete and consulting fees both are taxable as ordinary income, sellers have to remember that consulting agreements generally will require them to perform services, while covenants not to compete do not.

We hope this overview of the allocation requirements is helpful to you in your negotiations. If you need additional advice on this complex subject, please call for an appointment.

Reproduced with permission from CCH’s Client Letter, published and copyrighted by CCH Incorporated, 2700 Lake Cook Road, Riverwoods, IL 60015.

1 comment:

Stanley said...

This topic about business and tax is very intricate to understand. Thanks for sharing these information.

Options Trading Strategies